DMI - Design Management Institute Publications Publications
Shopping Cart Free Subscription Join DMI Contact Us Help
Conferences Seminars/Education Member Resources Publications Research DMI International About DMI
DMI News DMI Review DMI Academic Journal Case Studies Conference Recordings Special Reports Book Center

Log In
Job Bank
Professional Interest Areas
Resource Links

 

DMI News
 

Past Newsletters

Past eBulletins

Subscriptions

Newsletter Advertising

Submit News

 

 

Viewpoints

Gaining Approval for a Design Solution

 

By Peter L. Phillips, Design Strategy Consultant

 

An excerpt from the book, Creating the Perfect Design Brief, by Peter L. Phillips, published by Allworth Press with the Design Management Institute.

 

 

Peter L. Phillips
Peter Phillips

The process of gaining approval for a design solution is among the most painful and frustrating processes design groups face on a routine basis. I certainly suffered through these approval meetings for a number of years early in my career in corporate design. Finally, I had to face the fact that I needed to find a way to take the pain, frustration, and suffering away. At first, I thought it might be a hopeless quest—the impossible dream, if you will. I recalled that in school, I had one graphic design professor who, at the time, I thought was particularly harsh with this approval process. Finally I realized that, in fact, he wasn’t harsh at all—he was just preparing us for our careers!


He would assign a design problem for us to work through. On the appointed day when our solutions were to be presented, he would have us put our work along the ledge of the blackboard in the classroom. Without saying a word, he would walk along the board, and either leave your work where it was, or throw it on the floor! Actually, almost everybody’s work ended up on the floor. He would then turn to the class, and say, “Everything on the floor fails. If you think your work hasn’t failed, pick it up, put it back up on the ledge, and tell me and the class why it doesn’t fail.” Of course, most of us picked up our work, and tried to defend it. After all, we didn’t want to fail. While we desperately tried to defend our work, the professor kept interrupting by saying; “You’re too proud and defensive of your clever design solution, put it back on the floor!”


What he was teaching us is that design should not be defended. Design should not be a success because we thought so. Rather, we only got to keep our work up on the ledge when we could clearly explain why our solution met the objectives of the assignment. For some reason, it took me a few years to really understand what this professor had taught us. It was always too easy in school to talk a lot about how clever (creative, etc.) we had been with an assignment. Other design students knew what we were talking about, and were often very supportive. This is not the case in the corporate world. The other nondesign-trained stakeholders, particularly those who have the authority to approve—or disapprove—a design solution, are not cognizant of all the design techniques we know. They only know whether they like it or not.


The particular professor I am referring to was actually quite unique in his approach. What he was doing is certainly not the norm in most design classrooms today.


I have had the privilege of attending and speaking at a few HOW Magazine design conferences. At the HOW conferences they devote one evening to an event called, “The Student Showcase.” The organizers of the conference invite area design school students who are in their last year of study to bring their portfolios and display their work for all of the conference attendees. I really look forward to this annual event. I am often amazed at the talent and ability displayed by these students.


I attended one of these Student Showcase events and spotted one student whose work was particularly impressive. The young man was a graphic design student and had a large display of posters and brochures he had designed. As I approached the table where he was presenting his portfolio, I overheard him explaining one of his brochures to an attendee of the conference. With a great deal of excitement and intensity, the young man explained that on the first spread he had introduced an emotional experience. On the next spread, he had enhanced this experience by adding bold colors and avant-garde typographic treatments. Finally, he explained, he combined all of these design elements to bring the brochure to an exciting, emotional climax!


What this student was doing was explaining the design techniques he had considered and used to create what he believed to be a visually stunning piece. To another designer, his work was indeed, visually stunning. However, if he had used that kind of thinking in making a presentation of a brochure to a non-design trained CEO or marketing executive, he would have been in big trouble.


Let me assure you, I am not trying to belittle this student. He was doing what he was used to doing in design school. In design school, we present our work to fellow design students and design teachers. It seems normal to present design, well, as design. Unfortunately, this doesn’t work in the corporate world. The people we will present design solutions to in the business world don’t understand—or appreciate—the power of using negative space, bold color palettes, or unique typographic styles brilliantly. After we leave design school, we have to learn to present design solutions for final approval by non-design business managers in an entirely new way.


The key is not to try to defend design solutions by talking about design elements, but to present the results of the design solution vis-à-vis the objective of the project. It is up to us, the designers, to point out why a particular design solution works to meet the stated business objectives. We must take it away from the subjective, and move it into the objective.

 

This article is an excerpt from the book, “Creating the Perfect Design Brief”, by Peter L. Phillips, published by Allworth Press with the Design Management Institute (New York: Allworth Press, 2004, 191 pages, $19.95).

 

Peter L. Phillips is an internationally recognized expert in developing corporate and brand identity strategies and programs. He has had nearly thirty years experience as both a senior corporate manager and as a consultant. He distinguished himself in the corporate world as Director of Creative Services for the Gillette Company and as Director of Corporate Identity and Design for Digital Equipment Corporation. As a consultant, Peter has developed numerous global brand identity programs for many Fortune 500 companies. He teaches the seminars Creating the Perfect Design Brief and Managing Design for Strategic Advantage for DMI.

 

This article appeared in the November 2004 eBulletin.

 

Feedback on DMI Viewpoints and article proposals are always welcome! Please email jtobin@dmi.org. All articles reflect the opinion of the author and not the Design Management Institute.