DMI - Design Management Institute Publications Publications
Shopping Cart Free Subscription Join DMI Contact Us Help
Conferences Seminars/Education Member Resources Publications Research DMI International About DMI
DMI News DMI Review DMI Academic Journal Case Studies Conference Recordings Special Reports Book Center

Log In
Job Bank
Professional Interest Areas
Resource Links

 

DMI News
 

Past Newsletters

Past eBulletins

Subscriptions

Newsletter Advertising

Submit News

 

 

Viewpoints

Design Firms Beginning to Penetrate the Pharma Product Branding Area

By Ken DeLor, President, The DeLor Group

 

Photo of Ken DeLor
Ken DeLor

There was a time when a pharmaceutical company with a new drug could bank on profits rolling in for upwards of a decade, secure under a patented protection from most competition. The need for branding and marketing was minimal, with a single customer—the physician—being the recipient of clinical communication delivered by a sales rep.

But in the last decade, technologies that speed competitive drugs to market, cost pressures from managed care, and the abundance of generics have decreased the expected cash-flow cycle of new drugs. Then consider the tremendous impact of a relatively new customer—the American consumer. The FDA’s decision to allow direct-to-consumer advertising has not only given patients more knowledge, but also more power and a larger voice in doctor’s drug-prescribing decisions.

 

As a result of these changes, pharmaceutical brand managers now face similar challenges to those of their counterparts in consumer and B-to-B product companies. “Pharma” marketers now recognize the importance of establishing a unique brand identity for their products. Today, differentiation communicated through both brand promise and brand personality is imperative to sustaining a brand and its profitability.

But pulling off a truly branded product in the pharmaceutical industry has pitfalls and hurdles not associated with other industries. First, there is the relatively short amount of time that branding has been considered in the industry. Development of a visual identity for a pharmaceutical product historically has been a low priority, with scientists often naming the product and a visual identity coming as an afterthought, with little impact other than appearing as a “bug” at the bottom of a print ad.

 

For those products that do consider themselves “branded,” few brand identity standards exist, leaving multiple creative vendors to each work in their individual media, developing communications unique in look and feel, and showing little, if any, consistency across audiences. Pharmaceutical companies that operate this way provide great opportunities for brand identity firms. The pharmaceutical industry as a whole devotes the marketing dollars necessary to do the program right and execute it thoroughly. And who better to translate a product’s unique position and character into a brand identity and then into integrated brand communications than brand identity designers and marketers.

 

However, working in a highly regulated environment—which includes Food and Drug Administration rules and procedures, legal approval on all communication, and the protracted approval process that goes with it—is something designers are not accustomed to dealing with. It requires not only patience, but also a significant investment of time and people in learning the “science of the product.” Until a branding and design firm makes this investment, competing in the pharmaceutical environment is difficult.

Nonetheless, for the skilled branding firm, the pharmaceutical arena is in great need of identity and branding expertise. This complex marketplace has changed dramatically, from a time when branding was an afterthought, to now, when clarity and simplicity of message is critical. And branding firms can take a leading role in this new frontier of bringing pharmaceutical products to market.

 

Ken DeLor is president of The DeLor Group, a corporate and product brand identity firm.

October 2002 eBulletin